<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Your Brain On Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music</link>
	<description>Software and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Hyre</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-429</guid>
		<description>There is so much great stuff happening in the field now.

It was a an Oliver Sacks NPR interview, where he talked about the effect of music on formation of brain structures.  
http://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/200711094 has the interview

As I recall, composers end up with fMRI-visible structural changes.

So music is good for your brain.  We&#039;re just not sure exactly what KIND of music is best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much great stuff happening in the field now.</p>
<p>It was a an Oliver Sacks NPR interview, where he talked about the effect of music on formation of brain structures.<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/200711094" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/200711094</a> has the interview</p>
<p>As I recall, composers end up with fMRI-visible structural changes.</p>
<p>So music is good for your brain.  We&#8217;re just not sure exactly what KIND of music is best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interestingly</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Interestingly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit.

cheers, Interestingly!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation <img src='http://danweinreb.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway &#8230; nice blog to visit.</p>
<p>cheers, Interestingly!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Gulledge</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Gulledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-384</guid>
		<description>As a music major in college, I find that this does not surprise me.

A fellow music major who was in Jazz band with me had perfect pitch. I recall him having horrible headaches during marching season because the whole band was tuned about 15cents sharp. He was in a horrible mood during those times.

I asked him to explain his sense of perfect pitch to me. He described it using color. He said Pitches, when perfectly in tune, have a &#039;color&#039; - not tone color (aka timbre), but an actual visual color. He said Concert F looked like the color Blue.  So I asked him about flat tones and semitones. He said those tend to have both colors and usually end up a sort of grey with hues.

Fascinating for sure. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a music major in college, I find that this does not surprise me.</p>
<p>A fellow music major who was in Jazz band with me had perfect pitch. I recall him having horrible headaches during marching season because the whole band was tuned about 15cents sharp. He was in a horrible mood during those times.</p>
<p>I asked him to explain his sense of perfect pitch to me. He described it using color. He said Pitches, when perfectly in tune, have a &#8216;color&#8217; &#8211; not tone color (aka timbre), but an actual visual color. He said Concert F looked like the color Blue.  So I asked him about flat tones and semitones. He said those tend to have both colors and usually end up a sort of grey with hues.</p>
<p>Fascinating for sure. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlweinreb</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>dlweinreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Hi, Phil!  Yes, he certainly does speculate about that.  Chapter 9, &quot;The Music Instinct&quot;, is all about the question of why music abilities might have evolved. I think that, like much evolutionary psychology, it&#039;s a lot of speculation without a lot of actual scientific method, but it&#039;s quite interesting anyway.  I can&#039;t summarize it (too many ideas); check out the book.

By the way, if anyone has read &quot;Musicophilia&quot; by Oliver Sachs: was it good?  I actually learned about &quot;This is Your Brain On Music&quot; while reading a review of &quot;Musicophilia&quot;.  I think the reviewer preferred Levitin to Sachs.  I have read a lot of Sachs&#039;s books, and most have been very worthwhile, but some others were only so-so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Phil!  Yes, he certainly does speculate about that.  Chapter 9, &#8220;The Music Instinct&#8221;, is all about the question of why music abilities might have evolved. I think that, like much evolutionary psychology, it&#8217;s a lot of speculation without a lot of actual scientific method, but it&#8217;s quite interesting anyway.  I can&#8217;t summarize it (too many ideas); check out the book.</p>
<p>By the way, if anyone has read &#8220;Musicophilia&#8221; by Oliver Sachs: was it good?  I actually learned about &#8220;This is Your Brain On Music&#8221; while reading a review of &#8220;Musicophilia&#8221;.  I think the reviewer preferred Levitin to Sachs.  I have read a lot of Sachs&#8217;s books, and most have been very worthwhile, but some others were only so-so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Earnhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-383</guid>
		<description>The authors&#039; explanation of &quot;perfect pitch&quot; has the ring of truth from my personal experience. In my youth, I was in a very good choir. We had two week-long camps each summer where we learned music. At one of those camps, I realized I could consistently reproduce middle C -- I&#039;m almost certain that was from thinking about a particular piece we had learned. I knew all my intervals; I could sing any pitch by referencing middle C.

In her book &quot;Writing Down the Bones,&quot; Natalie Goldberg says that she knew herself as someone who was tone-deaf. She took a lesson from a Sufi singing master; he pointed out that singing was 90% listening and was a whole-body activity. That one lesson transformed the author&#039;s experience of singing.

I like the short book &quot;Harmonograph,&quot; which is the name of a drawing device that is driven by 2 pendulums that are normal to each other. The drawings can be modified by altering the length of the two pendulums, the weight hung on them, and the timing (e.g., phase) of the release of the two pendulums..

The author uses harmonograph drawings as a mechanism to teach basic principles of music theory, including the relatively recent musical invention of a well-tempered scale.

Apparently, the Harmonograph was a focal point for small parties and gatherings around 120 years ago. It made me think about how rarely we actually explore physical devices today. Simple harmonic motion is a mystery to most of us; concepts like resonance and damping are understood by fewer still. These concepts are crucial to understand how the structure of the human body works.

Did the authors speculate about why such elaborate mechanisms exist in homo sapiens to both recognize and repeat melodies? The first thought is the example from &quot;March of the Penguins&quot; where infants need to recognize their parents after long separation. Do humans ever need to do that? Are there other places these skills would be useful for our survival?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The authors&#8217; explanation of &#8220;perfect pitch&#8221; has the ring of truth from my personal experience. In my youth, I was in a very good choir. We had two week-long camps each summer where we learned music. At one of those camps, I realized I could consistently reproduce middle C &#8212; I&#8217;m almost certain that was from thinking about a particular piece we had learned. I knew all my intervals; I could sing any pitch by referencing middle C.</p>
<p>In her book &#8220;Writing Down the Bones,&#8221; Natalie Goldberg says that she knew herself as someone who was tone-deaf. She took a lesson from a Sufi singing master; he pointed out that singing was 90% listening and was a whole-body activity. That one lesson transformed the author&#8217;s experience of singing.</p>
<p>I like the short book &#8220;Harmonograph,&#8221; which is the name of a drawing device that is driven by 2 pendulums that are normal to each other. The drawings can be modified by altering the length of the two pendulums, the weight hung on them, and the timing (e.g., phase) of the release of the two pendulums..</p>
<p>The author uses harmonograph drawings as a mechanism to teach basic principles of music theory, including the relatively recent musical invention of a well-tempered scale.</p>
<p>Apparently, the Harmonograph was a focal point for small parties and gatherings around 120 years ago. It made me think about how rarely we actually explore physical devices today. Simple harmonic motion is a mystery to most of us; concepts like resonance and damping are understood by fewer still. These concepts are crucial to understand how the structure of the human body works.</p>
<p>Did the authors speculate about why such elaborate mechanisms exist in homo sapiens to both recognize and repeat melodies? The first thought is the example from &#8220;March of the Penguins&#8221; where infants need to recognize their parents after long separation. Do humans ever need to do that? Are there other places these skills would be useful for our survival?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Operates Directly On Your Abstract Syntax Tree &#187; What&#8217;s In Peter&#8217;s Head</title>
		<link>http://danweinreb.org/blog/this-is-your-brain-on-music/comment-page-1#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Operates Directly On Your Abstract Syntax Tree &#187; What&#8217;s In Peter&#8217;s Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlweinreb.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-382</guid>
		<description>[...] Weinreb recently wrote a review of a book called &#8220;This is Your Brain on Music&#8221; that I haven&#8217;t read but am dying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weinreb recently wrote a review of a book called &#8220;This is Your Brain on Music&#8221; that I haven&#8217;t read but am dying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

